Gravitywell.Research
VC Firms · Dossier

Creaegis.

The ex-Premji growth shop that raised India's biggest-ever first-time rupee fund ($425M, 2023) and led every round it entered: Zopper, Kale, Doceree, Onsurity, GIVA, Third Wave, with one serious scar: Medikabazaar's revenue-fraud entanglement.

$425M
biggest first-time rupee-GP raise in India (Sep 2023)
7 / 7
led every platform round it entered
₹530 Cr
GIVA Series C led (Jun 2025): marked above entry rounds
₹278.7 Cr
Medikabazaar indemnity claim in arbitration
Founded2018 (fund closed 2023)
HQBengaluru
StageGrowth · $25-40M lead cheques · 12-15 positions
CadenceRefreshed monthly
VintageJuly 2026

GW GP Score

Creaegis is Prakash Parthasarathy (Premji Invest's founding CIO) running the same playbook with outside LPs: $25-40M lead cheques into growth-stage consumer, fintech, health and SaaS, four a year, 12-15 total. Deployment is nearly done and the leads are marked up (GIVA's Series C priced above its entry, Third Wave attracted a ~$100M 2026 round). The asterisk is Medikabazaar: a PwC audit found 60%+ of GMV wrongly booked, the founder was ousted for fraud, and Series C investors' ₹278.7 Cr indemnity claim sits in arbitration. Fund II is expected but unannounced.

Gravitywell house view

Conditional hold: enough signal to track closely, not enough to underwrite without the next proof point.

Portfolio quality depends on a narrow theme; the right comp is concentration risk, not headline unicorn count.

Neutral · Low conviction

No named analyst override yet; current view is generated from the scored dossier and should be refreshed when the next primary source lands.

Live catalyst

Medikabazaar arbitration outcome (₹278.7 Cr claim).

What changes

Fund II launch and size.

Red-team case

Medikabazaar arbitration outcome: both capital and reputational marker for Fund II.

Freshness

Computed from current dossier sources; analyst override pending.

GW GP Score · research opinion
58
G3 · Sound
Outlook: Developing

A disciplined lead-investor debut with real markups and one absorbed governance failure: graded Developing until Fund II prices the record and Medikabazaar resolves.

Confidence: Low · Same G1-G6 ladder as Gravitywell Ratings · E
Portfolio quality62

Six clean positions marked up or stable; one serious impairment

Exit realisation40

None: vintage-appropriate but unproven

Sector positioning66

Growth consumer/health/fintech: sensible, not differentiated

Capital velocity62

Record maiden raise, disciplined deployment; Fund II pending

Franchise stability74

Ex-Premji team intact; no departures found

Portfolio quality 25% · Exit realisation 30% · Sector positioning 15% · Capital velocity 15% · Franchise stability 15%: see the full GP Score methodology · compare this firm →

Re-rating watch
Downgrade watch
Score pressure -6 to -4 · GW estimate

Pressure catalysts, fund status or evidence gaps outweigh current positives; score support depends on the next verification cycle.

Upgrade trigger

Fund II launch and size.

Downgrade trigger

IPO/secondary window fails to convert paper marks into distributions.

Next review

Medikabazaar arbitration outcome (₹278.7 Cr claim).

LP underwriting verdict
Weak / wait
Re-up score 54 · Thin cash trail
Why invest

The Fund II diligence is straightforward: GIVA/Third Wave marks vs the Medikabazaar arbitration. Ask specifically how the fraud was missed at Series C diligence: the answer tells you about the process, not the outcome.

Why pass

Medikabazaar arbitration outcome: both capital and reputational marker for Fund II.

Next proof point

Medikabazaar arbitration outcome (₹278.7 Cr claim).

Score actions
2026-0758

Coverage initiated: inaugural GW GP Score.

Catalyst exposure · latest source pressure

Recent public evidence mapped to this GP. Read this before reading the position table: it is where the score can move next.

Net catalyst read
-2
Pressure building

Keep the file warm; current events cut both ways or are not yet material enough to move score.

Attribution0 positive catalyst(s), 1 pressure catalyst(s); top driver: India PE-VC value down 5% YoY in H1 CY2026.

2026-07-02
Market beta
India PE-VC value down 5% YoY in H1 CY2026

The broad private-capital backdrop is selective rather than euphoric; fundraising and mark support now need firm-specific proof.

Score pressureRaises the bar for weak-DPI managers and stale flagship vehicles; rewards funds with fresh closes or visible exits.

What to watch

Separate broad PE-VC softness from venture AI strength before changing sector-positioning scores.

The funds

$425M maiden fund (~deployed) across 1 tracked vehicles.

VehicleVintageSizeStageNote
Maiden fund (CIF II AIF scheme)2023Trough window$425MGrowthvs $500M target; IFC $25.25M; ~$142M deployed by final close

Closest booksKenro Capital (1 shared) · Premji Invest (1 shared) · India Quotient (1 shared)computed · E

Prakash ParthasarathyFounder & Managing Partner · founding CIO of Premji Invest (2006-2017)

Fund analytics · LP underwriting screen

Computed from the public dossier: vehicle cadence, realised exits, mark drift, concentration and franchise stability. All computed signals are GW estimates.

Capital stack read
$425M · 2023
Latest fund
n.d.
Fund cadence
7
Tracked active
1
IPO / public queue
Mid-cycle1 vehicles tracked

Vehicle cadence is neither freshly restocked nor visibly stale.

Next liquidityGIVA

Realisation discipline40

0 visible exit events since Jul 2024.

Capital velocity62

Vehicle cadence is neither freshly restocked nor visibly stale.

Portfolio momentum72

4 up / 2 flat / 1 down tracked signals.

Franchise stability74

No senior departure flagged in key people.

Mark drift
Constructive

4 up / 2 flat / 1 down

Exit mix
0 IPO · 0 secondary

0 events since Jul 2024

Sector concentration
Consumer & Commerce · 30%

Largest tracked active exposure

Factor dispersion
34 pts

Higher spread = less balanced franchise

Marked overhangMedikabazaar: names with negative 12-month mark or momentum signals in the reconstructed book.

Vintage quality
Maiden fund (CIF II AIF scheme)Trough window

Best entry conditions of the cycle

Next liquidity calendar
GIVA

240+ stores; fourth tracked firm on this cap table (A91, Kenro, Premji)

Evidence confidence
Fund dataHigh

Latest cited source appears to be 2025.

Exit dataLow

0 visible events tracked.

Portfolio dataLow

7 representative positions tracked.

Team dataLow

No departure signal structured.

Performance proxyLow

Fund-level DPI/TVPI is usually not public; proxy remains estimated.

Peer benchmarks · equity cohort
Exit events
0

Peer median 2 · -2

IPO queue
1

Peer median 2 · -1

Cash conversion
25

Peer median 74 · -49

Mark drift
43

Peer median 62 · -18

Partner churn
0

Peer median 0 · +0

Diligence agenda · how this view can change

The live research question, the proof required, and the source standard. This prevents a GP score from becoming a stale label.

Current diligence status
Evidence gap

Exit data, Portfolio data, Team data, Performance proxy evidence remains low-confidence despite a scored dossier.

Source freshness

Recent · Latest cited source appears to be 2025.

Proof required

Upgrade the weak fields with dated facts before the next score action: Exit data, Portfolio data, Team data, Performance proxy.

Source bar

Prioritise filings and firm disclosures; mark estimates as GW E until then.

Kill switch

Fund II launch and size.

Next proof

GIVA: next public-market or secondary print

Evidence quality · source file health

How hard the public record is beneath this view: source mix, freshness, low-confidence fields and the next source action.

Evidence score
16
Evidence-risk file

Low-confidence fields: Exit data, Portfolio data, Team data, Performance proxy.

Source mix
1P · 3S · 1E

5 total sources · 20% primary

Freshness
Recent

Latest cited source appears to be 2025.

Latest source
2025

Entrackr: GIVA ₹530 Cr Series C (Jun 2025)

Refresh action
4 weak field(s)

Upgrade Exit data evidence before changing the score.

Source tiering follows Gravitywell policy: primary = filing/regulator/company disclosure, secondary = reputable media or research, E = Gravitywell estimate. Evidence score is a GW control metric, not an external rating.

The position book

Seven platform positions: effectively the complete book.

2positions contested with rival tracked books
CompanySectorEnteredEntry stageStatus12-mo signalLatest read
GIVAConsumer & Commerce2025Series C led (₹530 Cr)Soonicorn240+ stores; fourth tracked firm on this cap table (A91, Kenro, Premji)
Third Wave CoffeeConsumer & Commerce2024Series C led ($35M)Private~$100M 2026 follow-on with WestBridge
OnsurityFintech2024Series B led ($45M)PrivateEmployee health insurance
DocereeHealthcare2023Series B led ($35M)PrivateHealthcare programmatic marketing
Kale LogisticsLogistics & Infra2023Series B led ($30M)PrivateAir-cargo SaaS, global expansion
ZopperFintech2022Series C led ($75M rd)PrivateInsurtech SaaS
MedikabazaarHealthcare2022Series C co-led ($75M rd)PrivatePwC found >60% of GMV misbooked; founder ousted for fraud; arbitration ongoing

Representative tracked positions reconstructed from public disclosures: not the full book. 12-mo signal is a GW estimate of mark direction from round/exit prints (E). Ownership stakes are not shown: not reliably public.

Sector exposure · where the book leans

Share of the tracked active book by normalized sector (GW estimate): read against our sector dossiers for crowding.

Consumer & Commerce30%
Fintech28%
Healthcare28%
Logistics & Infra14%

New cheques · 2025-26

The 2024-26 tilt is consumer brands (Third Wave, GIVA) after 2022-23's B2B/SaaS entries: following where Indian growth-stage cash flow actually lives. Lead-only discipline never broke.

Third Wave CoffeeMay 2026
~$100M follow-on (co-led) · Consumer & Commerce

With WestBridge

GIVAJun 2025
₹530 Cr Series C (led) · Consumer & Commerce

Realisation · are LPs getting paid?

None: 2022-23 vintage. The fund's story will be written by GIVA and Third Wave realisations and by how Medikabazaar's arbitration lands.

MarkupsGIVA, Third Wave

Both re-priced upward by external rounds after Creaegis led

MedikabazaarImpaired

The book's largest early cheque entangled in fraud litigation

Fund IIExpected, unannounced

PitchBook shell exists; nothing public

Too young for returns; the observable is discipline (lead everything, four a year) and one governance failure absorbed early. GW read: the Premji pedigree is being validated deal-by-deal: Fund II's raise will price exactly that. E.

What they're doing

01

Lead-only growth investing: $25-40M cheques, board-level 'digital transformation + active management' model.

02

Concentration: 12-15 positions total: every deal must matter.

03

Consumer-brand tilt as the fund matures (GIVA, Third Wave) over the early B2B entries.

What can break

01

Medikabazaar arbitration outcome: both capital and reputational marker for Fund II.

02

Single-founder-brand franchise: Parthasarathy IS the firm to LPs.

03

Fully-deployed fund with no exits yet = raising Fund II entirely on marks.

The watch list · unresolved as of July 2026
W1

Medikabazaar arbitration outcome (₹278.7 Cr claim).

W2

Fund II launch and size.

W3

GIVA IPO chatter: would be the fund's first realisation path.

Point-in-time discipline: these are the open items we could not verify at the current vintage. They get resolved: confirmed, corrected or dropped, at the next monthly refresh, never silently.

The takes · one screen, three readers

For LPs

The Fund II diligence is straightforward: GIVA/Third Wave marks vs the Medikabazaar arbitration. Ask specifically how the fraud was missed at Series C diligence: the answer tells you about the process, not the outcome.

For rival GPs

Creaegis takes whole rounds, if it's in your process, you're syndicate or you're out. Its consumer conviction (coffee, jewellery) is a read on where growth-PE believes offline India compounds.

For sector teams

Its healthcare pair tells the sector's two stories at once: Doceree (data-driven pharma marketing, working) and Medikabazaar (B2B GMV inflation, litigated). Use both as diligence templates.

Data & sourcing policy

Sourcing. Every figure is sourced and dated. We tier provenance: Primary (official, regulatory, exchange or company filings), Secondary (tier-1 industry research and reputable media), and GW estimate (our own reconstruction or opinion, labelled, never presented as external fact). We prefer primary where it exists, reconcile divergent prints to cited ranges, and hold every number point-in-time: dated, and never silently restated; revisions publish as dated changes.

Fact vs opinion. Facts vs opinion: market sizes, official prints, prices, named deals and agency ratings are sourced facts (Primary/Secondary). Scores, grades, purity weights, scenario paths and indicative sparkline points are Gravitywell's analytical opinion (GW estimate): labelled, not presented as external data.

PPrimary: Official / regulatory / exchange / company filingSSecondary: Tier-1 industry research or reputable mediaEGW estimate: Gravitywell reconstruction or opinion: our analysis, not an external fact

GW GP Scores are research opinions, not investment advice, not a solicitation, and not an assessment under any SEBI regulation. Dossiers are compiled from public sources believed reliable; firms named did not participate and figures marked E are Gravitywell estimates. Point-in-time: dated to the vintage shown and never silently restated.

New reports and coverage updates. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.