How we research.
Research is only as useful as it is honest about its own limits. Here is how every Gravitywell report is built, rated, and disclosed.
We tell you how sure we are.
Every material claim carries one of three ratings. This is a research-confidence scale — a statement about the strength of our evidence. It is not a regulated credit rating.
Primary data and multiple corroborating sources. Assumptions are narrow and stress-tested. We would act on this ourselves.
Directionally sound, but resting on estimation or partial data. Reasonable people could land differently on the magnitude.
Early or thinly-sourced. A considered view worth stating, but one we expect to revise as evidence accumulates.
Source
Primary filings, regulatory data, market data, and on-the-ground signal — not secondary commentary.
Model
Structured estimation with the assumptions written down. Every number traces back to an input you can inspect.
Rate
Each material claim is assigned a High / Medium / Low confidence level before publication.
Review
A second analyst challenges the thesis and the ratings. Disagreements are resolved or disclosed.
Revise
Reports are living documents. When evidence changes, the view and its rating change — and we say so.
What goes in.
We build from primary material — company filings and disclosures, regulatory and policy documents, exchange and market data, and direct channel checks. Where we estimate, we say so and show the assumption. Where a source is paywalled or non-public, we cite its nature so you can weigh it.
No one pays for a verdict.
Gravitywell holds no banking, advisory, brokerage, or issuer relationships, and does not accept payment to cover or rate any entity. The research is the only product. Any position or potential conflict relevant to a report is disclosed on that report. Views are ours and are not investment advice.